Cartoon aided design: The lighter side of computing

Product Information

Wikipedia’s article “Classical electromagnetism and special relativity”, in particular Section 2.1 “Deriving magnetism from electrostatics”. This section begins with a Feynman quote: On my own part, I most certainly don’t wish to be sneering, by just putting an emphasis: “oh, you (possibly: you all) don’t understand me,” either. Hence, the suggestion—to just ask me! It helps keep the air clear. Either this, or that, but not both. Equivalent to the XOR logic gate. Example: “Give me liberty, or give me death” A model is a mathematical construct that describes some aspect of the material world. It’s purpose is to make visualization easy and give us an intuition for it.

Even if both the categories of rules (updating and measurements) are kept deterministic, the machine would still show certain similarities to the quantum mechanical (i.e. the actually existing) world—viz., a reduction in the number of input states required to get to a given observed state.”

Report project as inappropriate

To be fair I’m not really sure what his position is since he banned me for disagreeing without discussing it. Ultimately, we hope that it will be possible to formalize large amounts of modern mathematics in the univalent setting, and that doing so will give rise to both new theoretical insights and good numerical algorithms (extracted from code in a proof assistant like Coq) which can be applied to real-world problems by applied mathematicians. What does that lead to? Simple: The selection of one of the eigenstates making up the bra corresponds to and is brought about by the unspoken “environmental” aspects. The “environmental” aspects constitutes a hidden mechanism (which is not quite exactly a hidden variable), and it is responsible for the selection. Well, not specifically of the amplitudes being complex—almost every phenomenon in QM would still be there with positive and negative real amplitudes—but of the basic structure of QM, involving linearly-evolving amplitudes whose 2-norm is conserved, I claim yes. The “consciousness” joke at the end is priceless! You just punctured my fondest dream, that the brain is a QC. Ah well.

For people who, willfully or not, misunderstand my work and are open to reforming their ways I have a list of references of increasing mathematical precision that I send to help set them straight. This has now become first on that list.

The universe is a self-modeling language, and there are 3 levels of recursion: Information>Fields>Cognition. Each level has it’s own ‘arrow of time’. but while we’re on this topic of what is sufficient for describing QM, what about getting rid of reals too? Could you just describe QM in terms of rationals, floating point, or some finite theory? Anyway, it’s already past mid-night here, and I don’t want to be up till late every night. … So, thanks, and bye for now! I can’t really wrap my head around quantum Darwinism. I don’t understand pointer states or why they are needed. I am clueless about redundant encoding. Well I’m not a physicist so not surprising. But it is frustrating.